I recently had the pleasure of working with The Shape of Things, a wonderful crafts project that aimed to bring the work of new and emerging makers from diverse backgrounds to a mainstream audience.
It was a wonderful experience for me as the project was developed in such a way that artists, promoters, venues all worked together to develop the exhibtions and activities, and all participated in the audience development work.
In late summer last year we all took part in a one day discussion on the future for audience development in the crafts. The conversation took place in the beautiful Touchstones Gallery in Rochdale and included artists, writers, administrators, funders and audxience development specialists like me. The conclusion of the day, shouldn;t be surprising, but somehow it was. For those of us who work in tje arts sector it can be so easy to forget the experience of the arts when we are developing our funding proposals, project outlines etc etc. This discussion, invigorated by the mixed group participating, celebrated the conviviality of participationa nd neoyment of the crafts – the way that the process of making or enjoying objects brings us together as inividuals.
I wrote a paper summarising the day and musing on this idea, it has been published on The Shape of Things website. Please let me know what you think!
http://theshapeofthings.org.uk/?id=107



Learning to share
Arts organisations feel vulnerable. This is no surprise for a sector that is used to living on thin and unreliable resources, and being valued for our instrumental impacts rather than the intrinsic value of what we do. One of the ways the sector has countered this impression is by developing extremely high levels of professionalism. We’ve developed ourselves as viable businesses, our plans, policies and procedures providing evidence that we take ourselves seriously, and that we expect to be taken seriously by others.
While I applaud organisations that are run properly and efficiently and which are effective at advocacy and meeting targets, I do wonder whether we should re-appraise how this approach can affect our relationships with audiences. Recently it seems that the brands that are doing well are those that allow their audiences to take some ownership of the values, activity and approach of the organisation. This is antithetical to traditional brand theory which has regarded fierce protection of every aspect of the brand to be crucial.
Led by new technologies which have enabled all of us to be able to have choice over aspects of our lives that we wouldn’t have dreamed about a few years ago – audiences want to be involved. And if they like you, there’s a chance that they will want to use your brand, share your video or comment on your work. This raises a challenge to arts organsiations, stuck in the rut of providing a glossy, untouchable outward face, a professional veneer to disguise our fear that others will see our vulnerability. That our audiences might know that we are not perfect, that we are struggling, that we sometimes get things wrong.
It’s a major shift, to let our audiences share our brand, admit their ideas into our planning, in effect, to see them as much a part of our organisation as our buildings, our staff, our brand. the world is changing quickly though, and it seems likley that those organisations that are prepared to let down their guard, and enjoy our audiences desire to share and be part of what we do, will be the ones thriving in the future.
Posted by Caroline Griffin on August 7, 2009 in Audience development, digital, Ideas, Opinion
Tags: Audience development, audiences, comment, Ideas, Opinion